Under $1,000 CAD, real vlogging camera choice is thinner than the title suggests: of the three cameras owners actually discuss for this budget, only the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 clears the mark. The Sony ZV-E10 II and Sony ZV-1 II both sit above it in practice โ roughly $1,499 and $1,198 CAD โ so this guide treats them as stretch picks, not budget hits, and says so plainly rather than fudging the frame to make the title work. What follows is what owners on r/osmopocket, r/SonyAlpha, and r/Cameras report after buying, not a spec-sheet ranking, and the picture that emerges is less about which camera is objectively better and more about which trade-off โ price, stabilization, or lens flexibility โ you're actually willing to live with.
1. DJI Osmo Pocket 3 โ the only pick that actually fits under $1,000
At $505.99 CAD, the Osmo Pocket 3 is the pick that matches the title of this guide, and it's also the highest-scored of the three at 8.6/10. Owners on r/osmopocket talk almost entirely about the accessory layer rather than the core camera: the D-Log M color profile with downloadable LUTs comes up repeatedly as the reason to shoot flat and grade later, and ActiveTrack 6.0 gets credit for keeping a subject framed without touching the gimbal. Eight mentions in the sample, seven of them positive. The one negative note is specific and repeatable โ some owners report third-party ND filters, Freewell's in particular, coming loose when the gimbal is stowed, with one owner switching to Kfkoncept filters because they stay seated when the camera is shut down. A protective case shows up often enough as a near-mandatory add-on that it's worth budgeting for alongside the body.
2. Sony ZV-1 II โ thin data, but also misses the $1,000 mark
At roughly $1,499 CAD for the kit, the ZV-E10 II is meaningfully outside the $1,000 frame, but it draws the largest and most mixed sample of the three โ 9 mentions split 3 positive, 4 negative, 2 mixed. The 4K/60p 10-bit video and the jump in autofocus tracking get specific praise from owners moving up from the original ZV-E10. The recurring complaint is the missing mechanical shutter, which multiple owners flag as a dealbreaker if photography matters alongside video โ one commenter puts it bluntly: stick with the A6700 if you need a mechanical shutter at all. A separate owner who tested it against the Osmo Pocket 3 directly for handheld work reports preferring the gimbal for comfort and ease of getting usable footage, which is a useful data point against buying the ZV-E10 II purely for stabilization. The lack of an electronic viewfinder also draws a mixed-sentiment mention โ one owner calls the camera lightweight and easy to carry overall, but names the missing EVF as its biggest drawback, and a separate owner flags the same gap as making framing genuinely difficult in bright conditions.
3. Sony ZV-E10 II โ the stretch pick, if you can push to ~$1,499, but owner reports lean negative
At roughly $1,499 CAD for the kit, the ZV-E10 II is meaningfully outside the $1,000 frame, and its score was corrected to 6.3/10 after a sweep found the wall behind it leans negative, not positive โ 9 mentions split 3 positive, 4 negative, 2 mixed. The 4K/60p 10-bit video and the jump in autofocus tracking still get specific praise from owners moving up from the original ZV-E10, but the missing mechanical shutter is a recurring dealbreaker for owners who shoot photos alongside video โ one commenter puts it bluntly: stick with the A6700 if you need a mechanical shutter at all. A separate owner who tested it against the Osmo Pocket 3 directly for handheld work reports preferring the gimbal for comfort and ease of getting usable footage. The lack of an electronic viewfinder also draws complaints โ one owner calls the camera lightweight and easy to carry overall, but names the missing EVF as its biggest drawback, and a separate owner flags the same gap as making framing genuinely difficult in bright conditions. Buy it only if the 4K/60p spec and autofocus jump matter more to you than the recurring shutter and EVF complaints.
Best For
| DJI Osmo Pocket 3 | Sony ZV-1 II | Sony ZV-E10 II Mirrorโฆ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fits under $1,000 CAD | โ Only one that fits | โ | โ |
| Stabilization | โ Gimbal-based | โ | No IBIS |
| Owner mention volume | โ 8 mentions, mostly positive | โ | 9 mentions, mixed |
Who Itโs For

It's the only camera here that actually fits the budget, and owners rate it highest of the three โ plan on a protective case and non-Freewell ND filters.
See review โ
Owners with the largest sample here praise the autofocus and video specs, but flag the missing mechanical shutter hard if photography matters to you too.
See review โ
It also misses $1,000, and the owner sample is too thin to lean on โ the Mark I's optical stabilization and ND filters are a real trade-off you're giving up.
See review โWhat owners actually say
What buyers love
โThe lut is on dji Download Page. For Resolve I use two nodes to convert dlog to rec.709 and then Apply the dji lut. Looks amazingโ
r/osmopocket
โSecond Gen is much better on Video shooting but due to the lack of Mech shutter, it wouldn't be able to use flash. If you taking photo without flash, then you have no concern. Go get ZVE10 II, It can record 4K60P with 10bit which the first gen doesn't haveโ
r/SonyAlpha
Common complaints
Freewell ND filters fall off
Arent the freewell ones that Fall of when closing the Camera? I replaced mine with Kfkoncept because they are thinner and stay on the lense when Camera is shut down.
r/osmopocketNo mechanical shutter
The ZVE10ii doesn't have a mechanical shutter so it's not really suited for photography . The mark 1 on the other hand does.
r/SonyAlphaOwner preferred the Osmo for handheld work
I have both. Go with the Osmo. Way more comfortable and easier to get good footage because of the gimbal
r/osmopocketLoses OIS and ND filters versus the Mark I
Mark 1 is a much better camera overall: it has an optical image stabilization, built-in ND filters, a mechanical shutter and proper flash sync. While the later two are not very relevant for video, the image stabilization and ND filters definitely are. The image quality is more or less the same between the two.
r/CamerasIf the $1,000 CAD ceiling in the title is a hard limit, there's really one answer here: the DJI Osmo Pocket 3, the highest-scored of the three at 8.6/10 and the pick with the deepest, most positive owner sample. Budget a case and skip Freewell filters. The Sony ZV-1 II, at around $1,198, sits second on a thin 2-mention sample (1 positive, 1 negative) โ not enough data to trust confidently, but not a product with a documented negative pattern either; the loss of optical stabilization versus its own predecessor is worth knowing regardless. The Sony ZV-E10 II, despite the stronger 4K/60p spec sheet at roughly $1,499, now scores lowest of the three at 6.3/10 โ its 9-mention sample leans negative, led by the missing mechanical shutter and EVF complaints. Stretch to it only if those specific gaps don't matter for your use case.