I hold out hope that there were also some design changes to minimize or eliminate the moisture issue. If there were, Apple would NEVER admit this, so we will have to wait until someone tears them down. The new ones are 1.5 grams heavier, and that could just be the USB-C driver and connector . . . . but *maybe* they sealed some things up . . .
Apple AirPods Max Wireless Over-Ear Headphones with USB-C Charging
The Apple AirPods Max (USB-C) are the 2024 version of Apple's premium over-ear headphones, updated from Lightning to USB-C charging with new colour options. They use the H1 chip, Apple-designed 40mm drivers, Personalized Spatial Audio with head tracking, and 20-hour battery life. Available on Amazon.ca under ASIN B0DGJC52FP (Midnight).
5 mentions ยท 3 threadslast mention Apr 2026
Every mention, sourced
Real comments from Reddit, linked to the original thread. Nothing paraphrased.
Yeah I didn't like the sound quality out of the box, but it was a lot better after using an EQ from this sub. Dare I even say it's quite close to the Sennheiser's I'm daily driving
There is no moisture 'issue'; you'd see a residue on the boards or electronic components, or corrosion where the headband connectors are, and the nickel-plated headband contacts are pristine under a microscope ... The earcups themselves don't allow condensation to pass through to the electronics ... That's not to say that people shouldn't be disappointed with Apple - a flaw in the cable that allows the earcups to swivel causes the cable to split in some cases, exacerbated by encouraging users to place the units in their bra case for charging
as a longtime user of Sony's XM line, I recently picked up a pair of AirPods Max and echo your statements. ... $500 is a lot by comparison, but they're so far above in terms of build quality that I made a bet it will be worth it in the long run. I've probably spent $1200 on Sony's headphones over the last decade and don't have a functioning pair to show for it.
I have a smaller size head apm2 hurt me Sony xm6 were good just very shallow cups. I like the Bose.
โ What Works
- Sound quality earns praise, especially after EQ adjustment โ one owner compares it favorably to Sennheiser
- Build quality is cited as the reason to pay the premium over cheaper alternatives that wore out faster
- No confirmed moisture/water-damage issue per a detailed technical account โ the swivel-cable wear point is the real, narrower concern
โ ๏ธ Worth Knowing
- A cable design flaw at the earcup swivel point can split over time, worsened by folding into the charging case
- Fit doesn't suit smaller heads for at least one owner, causing discomfort
- Split evenly at 2 positive/2 negative of 5 mentions โ a genuine mixed picture, not a clear verdict either way
Owner mentions split evenly on the AirPods Max USB-C โ 2 positive, 2 negative, 1 mixed of 5. Owners who invested say the build quality and sound (especially after EQ tuning) justify the $599 CAD price against years of Sony headphones that didn't hold up. The negative half centers on fit for smaller heads and a genuine, if narrow, design flaw: the cable that lets the earcups swivel can split, especially for owners who charge them folded into the smart case. One detailed technical account pushes back on rumors of a moisture-related failure specifically, isolating the real issue to that cable design rather than water damage. Buy it if build quality and sound after EQ tuning matter more than price; check the fit and avoid folding the cable tightly if you're concerned about the swivel-cable wear point.


